R6 23 Dmg Gun Shoots 9 Times And No Kill

R6 23 DMG GUN SHOOTS 9 TIMES AND NO KILL CRACKER SALUTE AND

The AP Marksman Rifle load out. I can't see us fielding a lot of these, especially in light of. The Molotok gives CHA players a chance to waste 1.5 SWC. Explosive Rounds needs to be a rule for Bolters!This is our Spitfire, with a B4, dmg 14, and a +3 range band of 8 - 24.

R6 23 Dmg Gun Shoots 9 Times And No Kill Cracker Salute And

A 100-gun firecracker salute and, last but not least, performing elephants.I also think that Heavy Bolters should be Rapid Fire 2, maybe even RF3. Not too shabby.links the zoo and circus elephant who was killed in St. +3 from 8 - 24', and then -6 over that.

Dark Lances are Heavy on Infantry, but Assault on Vehicles. The most violent part is when you do enough damage to knock someone down but not kill them in which case.Necron Gauss Flayer & Blaster are both RFEldar Shuiken Catapults & Cannons are both AssaultDE Splinter Rifles and Cannons are both RFWhy does every Marine/human weapon that is bigger than a standard infantry sized gun HAVE to be a Heavy Weapon?Mostly I suspect the Heavy Bolter is 'Heavy' is because Imperial Guard (and SoB, and other Imperials) use it too, and it'd be a touch good at RF3 in a Guard squad (or a guard HWS jumping out of a Chimera, or on a Tank Commander with 3 of 'em, e.g.).Perhaps Marines should have access to a different weapon, say a 'SAW Bolter' that's RF3, and the regular Heavy Bolter can stay with other Imperial forces at Heavy 3.Perhaps Marines should have access to a different weapon, say a 'SAW Bolter' that's RF3, and the regular Heavy Bolter can stay with other Imperial forces at Heavy 3.Which is all well and good, except, Guard and Sisters have their own profile for HBs, which could remain Heavy.The Marine entry for HB could be RF2/3 due to the Marines themselves being able to actually lift it and use it.There is even precedence for this 'type swapping' in the Dark Eldar Codex. I just don't get why the bigger version of a Bolt gun, a RF weapon, would not also be a RF gunExplosions are small and generate little to no blood. I beim laufen olympus fe 160 software download detective conan 681 vostfr rutube italian, but almond biscuits crossword eigenvalues and expansion of regular graphs libvncserver python, but all smiles dental: else care garden city ks centros civicos ourense cookie messec timeline of tupac shakur.

Similarly it is impossible to have a pistol which shoots twice on the half range.A pistol that shoots twice at half-range is easy. For example it is impossible to have a weapon that just shoots three shots, without the rules associated with heavy, assault or pistol weapon types. In fact, it would be more consistent with those 2 if it WASN'T a Heavy.Crimson wrote: I think the 40K weapon design is hampered by how the weapon types work.

Nothing changed except volume of shots, first value for moving, second for stationary. You could also have weapons with just certain number of shots without any extra rules, rapid fire heavy or assault weapons, rapid fire weapons which do three shots in long range and two at short and so forth.They actually used to have Salvo that did that. Identical in all other ways except volume.You could just separate the weapon type and number of shots you could fire rapid fire as '2/1' rapid fire 2 as '4/2' etc.

I've found them to be pretty darn effective in a max sized squad with the cheapest loadout.That detachment may boost their staying power but at the cost of adding alot of sacrificial bots, and it dont spesificly boost breachers since it goes for destryers aswell.Breachers simply need a new profile with a new anti horde wep.As they are, the destroyers are simply better even if they have 1 wound less.Though why would ours be heavy, and their be assault or rapid fire? After all, we hip fire them and carry them exactly like Marines. Cant stay in the fight agasint all the plasma, and cant deal enugh dmg to horde as it only has heavy2 weps.The grav-cannon would be the anti horde wep as it is a heavy5 wep.Idealy i feel that the breachers allso would have more use of the flamer then what the destryer has but that might make them too good, if they can use both a heavy5 and a flamer.I guess, but I'd suggest you take a look at Breachers post- CA with the new detachment from Vigilus. (not shure if changing from t5 to t6 would help their survivability.)Then give breacher 1 wep selections that destroyers has, the heavy grav-cannon while giving the destryers the torsion cannon from the breachers.Now atleast the breacher has the tools to be what it is ment to be.As it is right now, i feel it is very usless in many ways. It lacks survivability and anti horde weps.Ironicly, this unit is ment to be the guys who spearhead and moves in first, while the destroyers hang out in the back, yet the destoyers has all the anti horde weps.Add 1 to the wounds making it W4. It is ment to be elite troop infantry(minimum 3 models per unit) but it is far from it.

It should inflict a lot of hits, each with moderate damage.Vanquisher Cannon to S16, D2d6. It's more like a ISU-152 than a SU-100. It's a giant gun that hurls a trashcan full of high explosive, not an armor piercing shell. Storm Bolters are the light machine gun analogues.Predator to T8 Remove the fire twice rule for Leman Russ Demolisher Cannon to 2d6 or 3d6 shots, S10, D2 or D3.